this is what atheism offers you!

     A question arises: If someone leaves Islam and presents his reasons for this act, then what prevents us from presenting our own reasons for which we reject atheism?      For an idea - any idea - to be feasible, it must be compatible with reason, science and morals. If you see an idea that collides with one of the previous three axes, know that it is a vain and sterile idea that will not bring you any good.

     So is atheism compatible with the above three? Or collide with them directly?  

    Let me introduce you to this issue by examining the extent of compatibility.

 ^{First: Atheism and Reason:}

     It may seem to you at first sight that you are in front of a new refined mental thought that frees the mind from its shackles and awakens gratitude from its slumber. This is what atheists always issue to us, but when we go deeper with atheism, we find an idea that does not respect reason and does not adhere to a single standard in research.

      For example, the law of “causation” is the law that governs the universe until today, so nothing happens in the universe - which is matter and energy in the language of contemporary scientists - except that it has a cause, an agent, an engine, or a maker.... name it what you want.

     Although the atheist agrees with us in this law that governs the actions of parts of this universe, he does not soon turn back, violating this principle, to say to you: I believe that everything in the universe has a scientific explanation, a cause and a maker, but I believe that the entire universe has no creator. There is no scientific explanation for its existence!      Because if he admitted the existence of the Creator of the universe, he recognized the existence of the God who flees from the recognition of his existence, and thus the atheist is in stark contrast.

     Some atheists may say.. Well: there is a maker of the universe, but this maker has another maker, so why do you want to make, O believer, the make of this universe is not made? Why do you want to get him out of the circle of causation?      The answer is simply: because He is not from the matter of the universe until the laws of cosmic matter are applied to Him.

     An atheist may object, saying: Who knows that He is not from the substance of this universe?

     And the answer: if He was from the substance of this universe, then that means that God exists before the existence of the substance of which He is made, and at the same time He is the maker of it! This means that the thing is ahead of itself in existence! Imagine that I say to you: I am made of clay even though I existed before the existence of clay from which I was originally created! It is not hidden what this idea of ​​mental incoherence, so we say that atheism is contrary to reason. 

^{Second: Atheism and Science:} 

    Atheists always brag about this phrase that says: "I believe in science" and this is in response to any believer who says to him that I follow the Qur'an and the Sunnah, as if the atheist refuses to follow these sciences that seem to him to be retrograde!

     Is this standard disciplined when dealing with an atheist? This is what we will discover together.

     Dear reader: The way to identify human knowledge that we have not witnessed is through the correct transmission, meaning that the human mind is determined to accept the transmitted information when there is evidence of the safety of transmission.

     Let me give you an example: What if your co-worker calls you and says that the manager is calling you tomorrow at eight in the morning for an emergency meeting?      What if your sister called you to say that your father or mother is in the hospital right now?      The truth is that in both of the previous examples, the information iis conveyed to you through a person in whom you trust - that is, you have evidence of the truthfulness of his claim - so through your knowledge of your colleague and your sister, you have experienced that they do not lie to you, so whenever they tell you a news, you believe it.

     But what if a guy you don't know tells you that your dad is sick or in the hospital? Will you initially believe him, as in the previous two examples, or will you stop to check the truthfulness of his claim? Undoubtedly, you will investigate it to make sure of the veracity of what he claimed.    

  What if someone is known as a lier told you something? Undoubtedly, you will not pay attention to his words and will not believe him because you know through your experience that he is a person known for lying and forgery.

      These examples represent to us how the human mind deals with cognitive transfers, therefore the atheist’s denial of religious books or historical legacies without evidence is a control and tyranny rejected by science.

     The important thing is that an atheist accepts what is published on the Internet from scientific research by some scientists whom he does not know and have not had contact with. Let's see why he accepts these researches? Why does he have this reliability with sciences and knowledge that he did not witness himself, but were transmitted to him? Why does an atheist accept the ascent of man on the moon even though he did not try it himself, but rather saw some pictures or video clips saying that? Why not criticize the credibility of these photos and those clips? Is there no error or forgery here as well? Or are these scholars infallible from falling into error and making a mistake?   

   The truth is that the atheist has a paradox here. He accepts from the knowledge what was made by Westerners, but he rejects or doubts any information transmitted by Muslims, even with the availability of evidence of its truthfulness and the absence of anything to criticize it!

     Someone might say: But these modern inventions indicate that? And here the answer is, how do we make sure of the authenticity of these inventions? By experience? How do we make sure of the validity of the experiment? By watching? How do we make sure that our observation is correct? with our minds? And how do we accept a result issued by a mind that is the product of pure randomness, which is the coincidence that an atheist believes that life and reason have existed with it!?      Of course, I do not doubt what science reveals to us, but I doubt the discipline of the criterion to which an atheist is judged.

 ^{Third: Atheism and morals:}   

  Here we have a big dilemma. Atheism does not have a fixed criterion that humans can agree on. Ethics in atheism is relative and varies according to every human being, because human nature did not give us a unified law to follow in the universe when it created us - allegedly an atheist of course - but left us like this and gave us minds to think. And some minds are not better than others. What your mind accepts is not necessarily accepted by my mind... We are equal in existence and humanity, and you do not have the right to impose your human opinion on my human opinion as well!  

    Someone might say: What about the charters of the United Nations? The answer: you may like it, but the others do not like it, for example, so why do you want to force others to accept it? Did nature, when it created you, endow you with a higher authority than others to impose your vision on the rest of mankind? 

     Imposing an opinion by force on others - with a belief in the nihilism of God and the nihilism of a divine source of legislation - is a violation of the right of others, as others have the right to do whatever they want, and here we will find that atheism leads to endless anarchy.

      On the practical side, atheism is a thought that establishes cuckoldness! 

     If you are an atheist, you are obligated to accept the right of others to commit moral atrocities in the name of “freedom.” You are obligated to accept the presence of a man sleeping with your son in his room in your house. You are obligated to accept your daughter's freedom to sell her honor to whomever she wants, for or without payment..You must accept everything that comes to your mind.

 Someone might say: What is the problem?     

The problem is that the openness of sex in this way makes society unappreciated for married life, makes young people reluctant to marry and have children, and deprives the female of her rights to have a husband, a home and a family.

Therefore, some Western countries find that their generations have aged and the number of their young children has decreased. 

     In addition, homosexuality is a sterile thing that is contrary to nature.

If you come to an island and place a group of homosexual men and women on it, life will end on that island after the death of this anomalous generation, who of course will not produce another generation.     

Unlike if you put two men and two women on this island and get married, life there will not stop and you will come after a century to find a full life, joyful children and an integrated society.  

    Brother reader: That is why we always say that atheism is a cancer that destroys reason, science and morals on its way.  

    And for all that we have mentioned, the inevitable punishment on the Day of Resurrection awaits those who decided to sell their minds, sciences, and morals to Satan under the name of freedom.

      I am writing these words for my fellow human brothers and sisters..Go back to God. Atheism makes human beings creatures that live without purpose and die without price..a method that gives the criminal comfort in his life and after his death, so there is no punishment or reward. 

     Return to your Lord before the dust embraces you, and you find what will not be fruitful.